EL SEGUNDO HIGH SCHOOL
CHARTING EVIDENCE OF STUDENTS ACHIEVING THE EAGLE EXPECTATIONS &
CONTENT STANDARDS
HOME GROUP: Social Studies/English
YOUR NAME R Gen
NAME OF TEACHER YOU
ARE OBSERVING P.
Harrison
NAME OF COURSE YOU
ARE OBSERVING Economics
SUBGROUP(S): Gender Groups
PART 1 (Complete from lessons found on web)
SOURCES OF
INFORMATION: Lessons found on the
WASC website; teacher-made tests, standardized tests, performance tests, other
examinations, exhibitions, projects, portfolios, self-assessments (found on the
WASC website), daily assignments, report card analyses,
1.
What did you find about student achievement
as you evaluated the result of student learning?
For the most part, when
teachers and lessons concentrated on improving the performance of a subgroup of
students, they are generally successful.
2. What did you find about student achievement as you evaluated the connection between the stated content standard(s) and the objective of the lesson?
I saw no real improvement in
achievement when the students were well informed of the content standards and
objectives. I saw no correlation between gender and knowledge of content
standards and objectives with achievement.
3. Did
you find anything special about the subgroups of your student population?
Statistically, females
out-performed males. However, instruction or knowledge of the content standards
did not play a role in this differentiation of achievement. Males were less motivated
to perform well than females. The difference in motivation had little to do
with style of teaching or knowledge of content standards and objective. I
suspect that the difference is more attributable to societal causes rather than
institutional or personal etiologies. Nonetheless, when teachers concentrated
on a subgroup, the subgroup performed better.
PART 2 (Complete while observing students in class)
OBSERVATIONS OF
STUDENTS WORKING:
1. What
did you find about student achievement as you observed students working?
Self-motivated students work
more efficiently than less-motivated students.
2.
Did you find anything special about
subgroups of your student population?
No.