Home

~ Halloween Issue ~
 

2006-2007 The Bay Eagle is published by the journalism class at El Segundo High School.
 

All Issues

Editorial

Feature

Opinion

 Entertainment

Sports

 


D
o Not Call (please!)
by Evan Parker, Staff Writer

     A loud, obnoxious tone pulsates in the foreground. "We don't want any", or "don't &%@* call me again" you might reply. Senior Daniel Commans uses a particularly discouraging technique to thwart his telemarketing opponents. He pretends to comply with the telemarketer's request, saying that his mother will be one the phone very soon, leaving them on the phone for minutes until he finally says, "She's in the bathroom". This, however, is a lie, she could easily waste her time cursing at telemarketers, but why even bother when you can ignore them altogether, all the while having so much fun? This constant state of deception must certainly be disorienting for telemarketers. However you choose to greet these little-paid, very insistent people (usually from some poor, underdeveloped country I might add), one thing is without doubt. This constant interruption has become very tiresome, and it must be stopped.
     Most of us know of a bill passed September 30, 2003 by President George W. Bush (one of few good things he has done, in my opinion), called the do-not-call registry. This bill is intended to help consumers block unwanted telephone solicitations, allowing the Federal Trade Commission to collect fees from telemarketers to fund the registry. Despite pressure from the telemarketing community, this bill was passed by both the House and Senate in just a week.
     The rules of the do-not-call registry are not overly restrictive, however they provide a reasonable umbrella of protection for consumers. Some important rules are as follows. Telephone solicitations occurring before 8 am or after 9 pm are prohibited. Anyone making a telephone solicitation call to your home must provide: their name, the name of the entity of which they are sponsoring, and a telephone number or address which the consumer may use to contact the entity. A person or a recorded voice representing the entity must begin talking within two seconds after the consumer answers. Solicitors are not allowed to charge consumer's credit cards without the consumer's permission. These same solicitors must also provide their caller identity so that consumers with the caller identity feature on their telephones may know who is calling. All telemarketing agencies must acquire the do-not-call list and may not call anyone on the list unless they have a previous business relationship or written permission with the consumer. Yes, this is a very important piece of legislation, however it is not as effective as it should be.
     Although the bill has eliminated a sizable portion of unsolicited telephone calls, there are ways telemarketers can manipulate the rules in order to reach potential clients. One way is for a company to call on behalf of a charity or a surveyor, who are not covered by the list. Are you angry yet? Even more infuriating are the times telemarketers simply ignore the list. Companies often do this and there is virtually nothing one can do about it but submit a fruitless complaint to the FTC. From personal experience this is simply ineffective, but seeing as it would be foolish to prosecute each individual case, this might just have to do. There has been much controversy over this bill, originating mostly from the telemarketing industry, naturally.
     The restrictions shouldn't stop there. This bill is not limiting our free speech, but merely expanding our rights. Saying that this bill limits free speech is simply the telemarketing industry's excuse to continue invading our privacy. Telemarketing solicitations have increased in numbers immensely in recent years, and thanks to bills such as this, it has become controllable. More legislation like the do-not-call registry will be welcome by many, and should expand consumer protection to include cell phones, fax machines and similar devices. As for the current legislation in place, the list should not only prohibit unsolicited telemarketing calls, but also political and charitable solicitations. After all, the consumer should be in control of who contacts them and no one else. They should be able to decide whether or not they want select people to contact them. And if consumers decide that they do want to be contacted, they have the power to do so. Otherwise, STOP CALLING ME!
 

© 2001-2007 The Bay Eagle | 640 Main Street | El Segundo, CA 90245 | Tel: (310) 615-2662 | Fax: (640) 497-8079