E Pluribus Unum 

  

            Recently, I read an article entitled “Remember America’s Motto: E Pluribus Unum”. The article, written by Dennis Prager, was trying to remind the reader of E Pluribus Unum (meaning one from many), in the hopes that the idea, E Pluribus Unum, would be better enforced in public school. Prager feels that the main focus of public schools should be “Americanizing” its students. He also feels that the only identity that should matter is your own persona; and that your race, religion, or sexual preference should not come into play.

Prager recommends that school clubs that exclude certain students should be taken out of public schools in order to unite, instead of divide, students with ethnicity, religion, and sexual preference. Although the idea of unity and acceptance are wonderful, the fact still remains that there are differences between the people in this country, and by limiting students the ability to express pride in who they are and where they come from is a violation of their constitutional rights. Will eliminating clubs based on issues such as ethnicity truly unite students, or might it make some students feel ostracized?

Personally, as an African-American in this country, I am quite tired of reading about George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, instead of Malcolm X or Maya Angelou. If the main purpose of public schools is to “Americanize” its students, then why not teach them about all of the great men and women who helped this country to prosper. And if the school’s curriculum does not provide that part of history for students to learn, then why should there not be a place on campus where students are able to learn about cultures in which they are interested? Many may say that there is no better place to learn about your culture and history than from your parents, but when kids spend the majority of their time at school with their teachers and peers, it would make more sense to provide them with that education.

            The way many dress expresses their personalities and makes a statement about what kind of person they are. By restricting the way students dress, Prager feels that the differences between students will not be emphasized. Many will agree that the way people dresses may be how people judge another when they first meet them. But whether you are putting yourself in a good light or not, that is your choice and that is a choice that should not be taken away from anyone, as guaranteed by the First Amendment.

            We are supposed to be living in a country where we have the freedom to express ourselves without fear, and if that freedom is taken away, then maybe it should be taken into consideration how much freedom we truly have. There were a few issues in the article that did make sense; trying to convince people that there is only one particular way of living is completely ridiculous, especially in a country that is built on the importance of individuality. This country is filled with diverse people who are of many different races and religions. We all have to live together in this country, so why not try to learn as much about each other as possible?

Back




September

October

November

December

January

February

March

April

May

June